Book Review – And Union No More A Novel by Stan Haynes

A Novel of Historical Fact and Fiction About Bleeding Kansas

And Union No More

And Union No More

Bleeding Kansas and its struggle to become either a free or a slave state in the Union is the theme of And Union No More. Pro-slavery and anti-slavery supporters battle it out in a territorial civil war. The story is told by the experiences of fictional and factual historical characters and with fictional and factual history.

Title: And Union No More A Novel.
Author: Stan Haynes
Author Stan Haynes lives in Maryland and is a graduate of the College of William & Mary and the University of Virginia School of Law. His legal career as an attorney was at a Baltimore law firm. Haynes has always had a passion for American history. His website is: www.stanhaynes.com.

Background Laws Leading to Bleeding Kansas

The Missouri Compromise of 1820, the Compromise of 1850, the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 are the background laws that led up to Bleeding Kansas. Stan Haynes’ novel And Union No More tells the story of Bleeding Kansas using both historical facts and fiction, along with historical and fictional characters to weave an interesting and intriguing story. Would the Kansas Territory become a free or a slave state when it entered the Union?

Missouri Compromise of 1820

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 meant that Missouri would enter the Union as a slave state while Maine would enter as a free state. This would maintain the balance of power in representation between free and slave states. Also in the Missouri Compromise, a virtual dividing line was established across a latitude of parallel 36°30′ north where slavery was permanently banned, excepting Missouri. This seemed to quell free vs. slave state tensions, but others saw more conflict coming.

Political Map of the United States 1856

Political Map of the United States 1856

The now aged Thomas Jefferson considered the Missouri Compromise as, “like a fire bell in the night, awakened me and filled me with terror.” John Adams, older than Jefferson, thought it the “title page to a great tragic volume.” Both of these great statesmen believed the Missouri Compromise would lead to future conflict over the “Peculiar Institution” of slavery. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 helped set the stage for what later became Bleeding Kansas.

Compromise of 1850

The Compromise of 1850 brought five separate bills that even more muddled the future of Kansas’ status as a free or slave state. The five separate bills of the Compromise of 1850 included:

1.) Allowing slavery in Washington, D.C., but outlawed the slave trade there.
2.) California came into the Union as a free state.
3.) Utah and New Mexico became territories that could decide by popular sovereignty if they would have slavery.
4.) New boundaries for the state of Texas were made following the Mexican-American War. Claims to parts of New Mexico were removed, but Texas was awarded $10 million in compensation.
5.) The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 required citizens to assist in apprehending runaway slaves and denied enslaved people a right to trial by jury.

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850

This act was especially controversial as it required that escaped slaves in free states be returned to slavery. The people of the free states were compelled to obey this law or suffer severe consequences of fines or jail. Because of the Fugitive Slave Act tensions increased between the North and the South, as did the chance of a Civil War.

Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854

The passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 added a very large area of territory which was now open for settlement in the United States. This territory came from the Louisiana Purchase made fifty years before with France.

Illinois Senator Stephen Douglas created a bill that divided this area into two territories, Kansas and Nebraska. Douglas came up with the idea of Popular Sovereignty which meant that the people of these two new territories would decide whether or not to allow slavery when they became states. This overturned the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and set the stage for Bleeding Kansas. Pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions fought violently in order to gain the Popular Sovereignty majority advantage for their respective cause. Pro-slavery Border Ruffians from Missouri and anti-slavery Kansas Territory Jayhawkers violently fought each other in a territorial civil war. Bleeding Kansas foreshadowed the Civil War.

Author Stan Haynes

Author Stan Haynes

Author Stan Haynes

In Stan Haynes’ And Union No More the main character is anti-slavery Montgomery “Monty” Tolliver who sets out from his hometown of Dayton, Ohio for the Kansas Territory. Monty is an idealistic young man who is an abolitionist and he wants the Kansas Territory to become a free state. Monty goes to Kansas to start a new life and business and he will bring his family from Ohio to Kansas when all is ready. On his journey Monty soon encounters others, both anti-slavery and pro-slavery supporters. Monty Tolliver experiences and participates in the violence and bloodshed struggle of Bleeding Kansas in the years before the Civil War.

Characters:

Note: On his And Union No More copyright page Stan Haynes makes this statement:
“This is a work of historical fiction. Where historical figures appear in the story, they are portrayed fictitiously, with details and events that are products of the author’s imagination, and should not be considered as real.”

Montgomery “Monty” Tolliver – The main character in Union No More is anti-slavery and abolitionist Monty Tolliver. Monty is a former Ohio congressman from Dayton. He goes to the Kansas Territory to start a new life and to help make it become a free state when it enters the Union. Tolliver meets two young men who are central to the story. He encounters various fictional assorted scoundrels, good people, and actual historical people. Tolliver is a captain in the free-state militia.

Robert Geddis – A restless anti-slavery young man from Rhode Island who becomes a close friend of Monty Tolliver and joins with him in the fight to make Kansas a free state. Geddis is a member of the free-state militia and a newspaper writer.

Billy Rutledge – Pro-slavery twenty-one year old Billy Rutledge is from Mississippi and he feels his life is not going anywhere. The Kansas-Nebraska Act spurs him to the Kansas Territory to fight against abolitionist and free-state Yankees. Helping to make Kansas a slave state gives his life meaning. Billy had a brother named Ben who died.

Henry Clay

Henry Clay

Henry Clay – Clay represented Kentucky in both the Senate and the House. He was anti-slavery and helped to found the Whig Party and the Republican Party. He is known as the “Great Compromiser.” Monty is influenced by Clay.

 

 

 

Ned Watkins – Watkins is pro-slavery and the leader of the secret Blue Lodge.

Raven – Raven is a code name. An older black woman and former slave who was set free after being bought by a benevolent young man. She now works the Underground Railroad as a conductor and the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 brings threat and danger to her. Raven helps Monty and Monty had helped Raven.

James Lane

James Lane

James Lane – A militia leader in the Kansas Territory whose dedication to the Kansas Territory becoming a free state is wavering and questionable.

 

 

 

John Brown The Tragic Prelude

John Brown The Tragic Prelude

John Brown – The violent abolitionist from Hudson, Ohio.

 

 

 

 

Presidential Candidate Abraham Lincoln 1860

Presidential Candidate Abraham Lincoln 1860

Abraham Lincoln – Before he became the 16th president of the United States.

 

 

 

 

Some Story Events Of And Union No More:

  • Montgomery “Monty” Tolliver is a former Ohio Congressman who worked with Henry Clay. He returns to his hometown of Dayton and rekindles his lost relationship with his life-long love.
  • Monty goes to Bleeding Kansas on a journey to start a new life for himself and his family. Monty is idealistic and wants to help make Kansas a free state when it comes into the Union.
  • Monty meets two young men who become his friends on his journey. Billy Rutledge is from Mississippi and is pro-slavery, Robert Geddis is from Rode Island and is anti-slavery.
  • Billy Rutledge joins the secret pro-slavery Blue Lodge and takes an oath. The Blue Lodge is violent and burns cabins of anti-slavery settlers. Billy must participate in the violence, but is opposed to it.
  • Monty and Robert witness the attack and violence on anti-slavery supporting Lawrence, Kansas. They are members of the free-state militia and Monty is a militia captain.
  • Monty and Robert investigate the murders of pro-slavery supporters by anti-slavery supporters at Pottawatomie Creek.
  • While he was an Ohio congressman in 1844, Monty is involved in a plot with another (whose identity is later revealed as a surprise) to assassinate pro-slavery President John Tyler.
  • The Underground Railroad and story characters who are part of it, are prominent in the novel. There is Raven, and a mysterious “coyote.” Both have strong connections to Monty. There are surprises for the reader.
  • A future president, Abraham Lincoln gives a defining speech at Peoria, Illinois in October 1854. Lincoln speaks of his view on Popular Sovereignty and the Kansas- Nebraska Act.
  • Border Ruffians from Missouri interfere with voting by causing fraud in the Kansas Territory in order to make it a slave state. There is conflict between the Free-State Party and the Law-And-Order-Party as they compete against one another for their causes.
  • There is a double murder of anti-slavery men and pro-slavery Billy Rutledge is arrested for the murders. Is he innocent and has been set up, or is he guilty? Will Billy hang for the murders? Do anti-slavery Monty and Robert unexpectedly come to help the pro-slavery Rutledge? A mysterious message comes to Monty and a secret meeting occurs with a significant historical individual who plays a compelling role in this drama.. The plot of And Union No More explodes with intrigue.
  • The Wakusa War begins after a free-stater is killed over a land dispute by a pro-slavery neighbor.
  • Writer and newspaperman Robert Geddis interviews radical abolitionist John Brown. As Haynes tells his story, Brown becomes more and more central.
  • There is the Battle of Black Jack. Is it the actual first battle of the Civil War?
  • Robert Geddis receives a “CONFIDENTIAL” letter from a key individual that reveals information of what happened behind the scenes. This letter wraps things up in And Union No More.
  • Presidential candidate Abraham Lincoln gives a speech at Leavenworth, Kansas in December 1859. Monty Tolliver meets Lincoln.

Conclusion

Get And Union No More at Amazon

Get And Union No More at Amazon

I greatly recommend this novel to you. It is based on history and imagination and is well worth your attention and time. You will learn about events prior to the Civil War as Stan Haynes writes an engaging story using a combination of fact and fiction about Bleeding Kansas and its tribulation of becoming a free state. You will be informed and entertained by this novel. I give And Union No More a five star rating and a huge thumbs-up.

Product details:

Title: And Union No More A Novel
ASIN ‏ : ‎ B0BY39X93D
Publication date ‏ : ‎ April 11, 2023
Language ‏ : ‎ English
File size ‏ : ‎ 3771 KB
Text-to-Speech ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Screen Reader ‏ : ‎ Supported
Enhanced typesetting ‏ : ‎ Enabled
X-Ray ‏ : ‎ Not Enabled
Word Wise ‏ : ‎ Enabled
Sticky notes ‏ : ‎ On Kindle Scribe
Print length ‏ : ‎ 255 pages
Best Sellers Rank: #117,504 in Kindle Store (See Top 100 in Kindle Store)
#121 in Political Fiction (Kindle Store)
#295 in Political Fiction (Books)
#4,513 in Historical Fiction (Kindle Store)
Customer Reviews:
4.2 4.2 out of 5 stars 37 ratings

Get Other Books By Stan Haynes at Amazon:

1850 Fugitive Slave Law

An Ugly Law Of Compromise To Satisfy Southern Slaveholders

A Ride for Liberty - The Fugitive Slaves

A Ride for Liberty – The Fugitive Slaves

The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 meant that if you were an escaping slave or a slave who had escaped to a free Northern state, then you could be hunted down by slaveowners or paid slavecatchers, and returned to slavery in the South. The law required local governments in the free Northern states to cooperate with and not prevent, the efforts of the slaveowners and slavecatchers. If you were a fugitive from slavery, it did not matter how long you had lived in Northern freedom, you could be legally pursued, tracked down, captured, and returned to slavery.

Under the Fugitive Slave Law, if you were a white or free black person and you aided a runaway escaped slave, perhaps by providing food, clothing, care, or shelter, then you were guilty of a federal crime and could be given a heavy fine of $1000 and imprisonment of six months. Citizens had to cooperate with the Fugitive Slave Law. People were required: “to aid and assist in the prompt and efficient execution of this law, whenever their services may be required.”

Note: The names “Fugitive Slave Act” and “Fugitive Slave Law” are interchangeable.

An office of federal commissioners was created by the law and the commissioners determined if a black person captured by slaveowners or slavecatchers was in fact, a runaway slave. These commissioners acted without regard or constraint of state and local laws. By the Fugitive Slave Law there was no trial by jury or the right to habeas corpus for captured runaways. A rigged bounty system almost assured that you would be determined to be a runaway slave because the commissioners were paid $10 for each slave returned to slavery, but only $5 if they determined you to not be runaway slave. Both runaways and freed slaves were returned to slavery by the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, sometimes even entire free black families were said to be runaways by the slavecatchers and commissioners. Blacks who had been born free had little or no proof of their right to freedom and were accused of being runaways, they would find themselves taken South to toil as slaves. James Phillips was a free black man in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania where he lived and worked for fourteen years, but by the Fugitive Slave Law he was arrested in May, 1852. It was nothing but kidnapping.

Frederick Douglass Regarding The Fugitive Slave Law

Frederick Douglass, circa 1860s.

Frederick Douglass, circa 1860s.

“The only way to make the Fugitive Slave Law a dead letter is to make half a dozen or more dead kidnappers. A half dozen more dead kidnappers carried down South would cool the ardor of the Southern gentlemen, and keep their rapacity in check… A black man may be carried away without any reference to a jury. It is only necessary to claim him, and that some villain should swear to his identity. There is more protection there for a horse, for a donkey, or anything, rather than a colored man–who is, therefore, justified in the eye of God in maintaining his right with arm.”

How The Fugitive Slave Law Came About- The Compromise of 1850

The Mexican War lasted sixteen months (1846-1848) and under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, a vast amount of territory was added to the United States. This territory would eventually become the states of California, Nevada, and Utah, most of the state of Arizona, and parts of the states of Colorado, Wyoming, and New Mexico. Besides adding new territory to the United States, the Mexican War also added new political debate and conflict within the country. Would the new territory be slave or free?

Matters came to a boil when California was admitted to the Union as a state in 1850. Even then, California had a huge population and if it became a free state, then the political representative balance between North and South would be upset. The North already held an advantage in the House, and if California became free then it meant the North would also have a Senate majority. This launched a contentious and explosive political debate. California’s status, and also the rest of the newly acquired territory, of being made free or slave would shift political power dramatically in a country already strongly divided over slavery.

Henry Clay.

Henry Clay.

Senator Henry Clay was a Whig from Kentucky and he was an experienced politician whose career had included time as congressman, senator, secretary of state, and as a presidential candidate. Clay had the art of compromise in his bones, earlier when the United States had faced severe division between the political parties of North and South Henry Clay had devised compromises in the forms of the Missouri Compromise and the Compromise Tariff. Clay’s efforts of compromise worked and disunion was prevented with these measures.

In 1850, Henry Clay was seventy-three-years old but the white-haired Kentucky senator had another compromise up his sleeve. Clay drafted a compromise to ward off the threat of disunion between North and South brought about by whether or not California and the other lands acquired from Mexico would be free or slave. Henry Clay’s Compromise of 1850 at first failed to pass, but then Democrat Stephen Douglass of Illinois by Clay’s guidance arranged the Compromise of 1850 into five smaller acts, and then it narrowly passed.

The Compromise of 1850 was successful in avoiding secession and a Civil War… until 1860. However, the Fugitive Slave Law of the Compromise of 1850 left the country with an ugly law that only the bloodshed of a Civil War would remove.

The Compromise of 1850

  • California would be a free state. (pro-free)
  • Slave trade (But not slavery!) would be abolished in the District of Columbia. (pro-free)
  • The citizens of Utah and New Mexico would decide by popular sovereignty whether their territories were to have slavery. (pro-slave)
  • Texas (a slave state) would not further expand at the expense of New Mexico territory, and the Federal government would award $10 million to Texas to settle claims of its national debt. (pro-slave)
  • The Fugitive Slave Law was created. (pro-slave)

Steal Away – Reverend Pearly Brown

The Fugitive Slave Act 1850

Section 1


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the persons who have been, or may hereafter be, appointed commissioners, in virtue of any act of Congress, by the Circuit Courts of the United States, and Who, in consequence of such appointment, are authorized to exercise the powers that any justice of the peace, or other magistrate of any of the United States, may exercise in respect to offenders for any crime or offense against the United States, by arresting, imprisoning, or bailing the same under and by the virtue of the thirty-third section of the act of the twenty-fourth of September seventeen hundred and eighty-nine, entitled “An Act to establish the judicial courts of the United States” shall be, and are hereby, authorized and required to exercise and discharge all the powers and duties conferred by this act.

Section 2


And be it further enacted, That the Superior Court of each organized Territory of the United States shall have the same power to appoint commissioners to take acknowledgments of bail and affidavits, and to take depositions of witnesses in civil causes, which is now possessed by the Circuit Court of the United States; and all commissioners who shall hereafter be appointed for such purposes by the Superior Court of any organized Territory of the United States, shall possess all the powers, and exercise all the duties, conferred by law upon the commissioners appointed by the Circuit Courts of the United States for similar purposes, and shall moreover exercise and discharge all the powers and duties conferred by this act.

Section 3

And be it further enacted, That the Circuit Courts of the United States shall from time to time enlarge the number of the commissioners, with a view to afford reasonable facilities to reclaim fugitives from labor, and to the prompt discharge of the duties imposed by this act.

Section 4


And be it further enacted, That the commissioners above named shall have concurrent jurisdiction with the judges of the Circuit and District Courts of the United States, in their respective circuits and districts within the several States, and the judges of the Superior Courts of the Territories, severally and collectively, in term-time and vacation; shall grant certificates to such claimants, upon satisfactory proof being made, with authority to take and remove such fugitives from service or labor, under the restrictions herein contained, to the State or Territory from which such persons may have escaped or fled.

Section 5


Am I Not A Man And A Brother?

Am I Not A Man And A Brother?


And be it further enacted, That it shall be the duty of all marshals and deputy marshals to obey and execute all warrants and precepts issued under the provisions of this act, when to them directed; and should any marshal or deputy marshal refuse to receive such warrant, or other process, when tendered, or to use all proper means diligently to execute the same, he shall, on conviction thereof, be fined in the sum of one thousand dollars, to the use of such claimant, on the motion of such claimant, by the Circuit or District Court for the district of such marshal; and after arrest of such fugitive, by such marshal or his deputy, or whilst at any time in his custody under the provisions of this act, should such fugitive escape, whether with or without the assent of such marshal or his deputy, such marshal shall be liable, on his official bond, to be prosecuted for the benefit of such claimant, for the full value of the service or labor of said fugitive in the State, Territory, or District whence he escaped: and the better to enable the said commissioners, when thus appointed, to execute their duties faithfully and efficiently, in conformity with the requirements of the Constitution of the United States and of this act, they are hereby authorized and empowered, within their counties respectively, to appoint, in writing under their hands, any one or more suitable persons, from time to time, to execute all such warrants and other process as may be issued by them in the lawful performance of their respective duties; with authority to such commissioners, or the persons to be appointed by them, to execute process as aforesaid, to summon and call to their aid the bystanders, or posse comitatus of the proper county, when necessary to ensure a faithful observance of the clause of the Constitution referred to, in conformity with the provisions of this act; and all good citizens are hereby commanded to aid and assist in the prompt and efficient execution of this law, whenever their services may be required, as aforesaid, for that purpose; and said warrants shall run, and be executed by said officers, any where in the State within which they are issued.

Section 6


Runaway slave.

Runaway slave.

And be it further enacted, That when a person held to service or labor in any State or Territory of the United States, has heretofore or shall hereafter escape into another State or Territory of the United States, the person or persons to whom such service or labor may be due, or his, her, or their agent or attorney, duly authorized, by power of attorney, in writing, acknowledged and certified under the seal of some legal officer or court of the State or Territory in which the same may be executed, may pursue and reclaim such fugitive person, either by procuring a warrant from some one of the courts, judges, or commissioners aforesaid, of the proper circuit, district, or county, for the apprehension of such fugitive from service or labor, or by seizing and arresting such fugitive, where the same can be done without process, and by taking, or causing such person to be taken, forthwith before such court, judge, or commissioner, whose duty it shall be to hear and determine the case of such claimant in a summary manner; and upon satisfactory proof being made, by deposition or affidavit, in writing, to be taken and certified by such court, judge, or commissioner, or by other satisfactory testimony, duly taken and certified by some court, magistrate, justice of the peace, or other legal officer authorized to administer an oath and take depositions under the laws of the State or Territory from which such person owing service or labor may have escaped, with a certificate of such magistracy or other authority, as aforesaid, with the seal of the proper court or officer thereto attached, which seal shall be sufficient to establish the competency of the proof, and with proof, also by affidavit, of the identity of the person whose service or labor is claimed to be due as aforesaid, that the person so arrested does in fact owe service or labor to the person or persons claiming him or her, in the State or Territory from which such fugitive may have escaped as aforesaid, and that said person escaped, to make out and deliver to such claimant, his or her agent or attorney, a certificate setting forth the substantial facts as to the service or labor due from such fugitive to the claimant, and of his or her escape from the State or Territory in which he or she was arrested, with authority to such claimant, or his or her agent or attorney, to use such reasonable force and restraint as may be necessary, under the circumstances of the case, to take and remove such fugitive person back to the State or Territory whence he or she may have escaped as aforesaid. In no trial or hearing under this act shall the testimony of such alleged fugitive be admitted in evidence; and the certificates in this and the first [fourth] section mentioned, shall be conclusive of the right of the person or persons in whose favor granted, to remove such fugitive to the State or Territory from which he escaped, and shall prevent all molestation of such person or persons by any process issued by any court, judge, magistrate, or other person whomsoever.

Section 7


And be it further enacted, That any person who shall knowingly and willingly obstruct, hinder, or prevent such claimant, his agent or attorney, or any person or persons lawfully assisting him, her, or them, from arresting such a fugitive from service or labor, either with or without process as aforesaid, or shall rescue, or attempt to rescue, such fugitive from service or labor, from the custody of such claimant, his or her agent or attorney, or other person or persons lawfully assisting as aforesaid, when so arrested, pursuant to the authority herein given and declared; or shall aid, abet, or assist such person so owing service or labor as aforesaid, directly or indirectly, to escape from such claimant, his agent or attorney, or other person or persons legally authorized as aforesaid; or shall harbor or conceal such fugitive, so as to prevent the discovery and arrest of such person, after notice or knowledge of the fact that such person was a fugitive from service or labor as aforesaid, shall, for either of said offences, be subject to a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, and imprisonment not exceeding six months, by indictment and conviction before the District Court of the United States for the district in which such offence may have been committed, or before the proper court of criminal jurisdiction, if committed within any one of the organized Territories of the United States; and shall moreover forfeit and pay, by way of civil damages to the party injured by such illegal conduct, the sum of one thousand dollars for each fugitive so lost as aforesaid, to be recovered by action of debt, in any of the District or Territorial Courts aforesaid, within whose jurisdiction the said offence may have been committed.

Section 8


And be it further enacted, That the marshals, their deputies, and the clerks of the said District and Territorial Courts, shall be paid, for their services, the like fees as may be allowed for similar services in other cases; and where such services are rendered exclusively in the arrest, custody, and delivery of the fugitive to the claimant, his or her agent or attorney, or where such supposed fugitive may be discharged out of custody for the want of sufficient proof as aforesaid, then such fees are to be paid in whole by such claimant, his or her agent or attorney; and in all cases where the proceedings are before a commissioner, he shall be entitled to a fee of ten dollars in full for his services in each case, upon the delivery of the said certificate to the claimant, his agent or attorney; or a fee of five dollars in cases where the proof shall not, in the opinion of such commissioner, warrant such certificate and delivery, inclusive of all services incident to such arrest and examination, to be paid, in either case, by the claimant, his or her agent or attorney. The person or persons authorized to execute the process to be issued by such commissioner for the arrest and detention of fugitives from service or labor as aforesaid, shall also be entitled to a fee of five dollars each for each person he or they may arrest, and take before any commissioner as aforesaid, at the instance and request of such claimant, with such other fees as may be deemed reasonable by such commissioner for such other additional services as may be necessarily performed by him or them; such as attending at the examination, keeping the fugitive in custody, and providing him with food and lodging during his detention, and until the final determination of such commissioners; and, in general, for performing such other duties as may be required by such claimant, his or her attorney or agent, or commissioner in the premises, such fees to be made up in conformity with the fees usually charged by the officers of the courts of justice within the proper district or county, as near as may be practicable, and paid by such claimants, their agents or attorneys, whether such supposed fugitives from service or labor be ordered to be delivered to such claimant by the final determination of such commissioner or not.

Section 9


And be it further enacted, That, upon affidavit made by the claimant of such fugitive, his agent or attorney, after such certificate has been issued, that he has reason to apprehend that such fugitive will he rescued by force from his or their possession before he can be taken beyond the limits of the State in which the arrest is made, it shall be the duty of the officer making the arrest to retain such fugitive in his custody, and to remove him to the State whence he fled, and there to deliver him to said claimant,
his agent, or attorney. And to this end, the officer aforesaid is hereby authorized and required to employ so many persons as he may deem necessary to overcome such force, and to retain them in his service so long as circumstances may require. The said officer and his assistants, while so employed, to receive the same compensation, and to be allowed the same expenses, as are now allowed by law for transportation of criminals, to be certified by the judge of the district within which the arrest is made, and paid out of the treasury of the United States.

Section 10


Slave kidnap poster. Boston, 1851.

Slave kidnap poster. Boston, 1851.

And be it further enacted, That when any person held to service or labor in any State or Territory, or in the District of Columbia, shall escape therefrom, the party to whom such service or labor shall be due, his, her, or their agent or attorney, may apply to any court of record therein, or judge thereof in vacation, and make satisfactory proof to such court, or judge in vacation, of the escape aforesaid, and that the person escaping owed service or labor to such party. Whereupon the court shall cause a record to be made of the matters so proved, and also a general description of the person so escaping, with such convenient certainty as may be; and a transcript of such record, authenticated by the attestation of the clerk and of the seal of the said court, being produced in any other State, Territory, or district in which the person so escaping may be found, and being exhibited to any judge, commissioner, or other office, authorized by the law of the United States to cause persons escaping from service or labor to be delivered up, shall be held and taken to be full and conclusive evidence of the fact of escape, and that the service or labor of the person escaping is due to the party in such record mentioned. And upon the production by the said party of other and further evidence if necessary, either oral or by affidavit, in addition to what is contained in the said record of the identity of the person escaping, he or she shall be delivered up to the claimant, And the said court, commissioner, judge, or other person authorized by this act to grant certificates to claimants or fugitives, shall, upon the production of the record and other evidences aforesaid, grant to such claimant a certificate of his right to take any such person identified and proved to be owing service or labor as aforesaid, which certificate shall authorize such claimant to seize or arrest and transport such person to the State or Territory from which he escaped: Provided, That nothing herein contained shall be construed as requiring the production of a transcript of such record as evidence as aforesaid. But in its absence the claim shall be heard and determined upon other satisfactory proofs, competent in law.

Approved, September 18, 1850.

Learn Civil War History Podcast Episode Seven: Freedman Jourdon Anderson Writes A Letter To His Old Master

Spotify